This week we’ll wrap-up our review of chapter 8 in Isaiah Decoded – The God of Israel, King of Zion. In this week’s review, we’ll consider how Yehovah-Yeshua becomes like His Father the Most High God even an Eternal Father. Overview We saw previously that Yehovah-Yeshua is on His own path of transformation to become like His Father. When we look at the transformation process of the Son becoming like the Father, three primary aspects immerge – the Son obtains the status of a god; He administers the Father’s plan to exalt humanity, and the Son becomes an Eternal Father.
The Son Becomes an Eternal Father When we consider how Yehovah-Yeshua becomes an Eternal Father, three aspects emerge – the Son passes through His own descent before ascent, which previously was called a baptism of fire; He obtains the power of the resurrection for Himself and Humanity; and He becomes a father of spirits.
“The king of Babylon’s aspiration in the Servant–Tyrant Parallelism to “ascend in the heavens and set my throne above the stars of God”—to become “like the Most High [God]”— was thus fulfilled in the Son of the Most High God, Jesus Christ. (Isaiah 14:13–14.)” – P. 305 The Son’s Descent before His Ascent The Son Himself must pass through His own “baptism of fire” before He becomes like His father. He must descend below all things so that He can prove His resolve to do the Father’s Will in saving Humanity. He - Yehovah - accomplishes this by taking on mortality, suffering for the injustices of Humanity, and then dying to pay for the price of sin as Yeshua. This is the Son’s descent. “Jehovah’s role as the Firstborn Son of the Most High God implied that above all he was his Father’s heir. But his ascent to his Father’s glory would follow his descent into death (see Figure 126). His “salvation” and “exaltation” would be equal to the requisite “suffering” and “humiliation.” Figure 126 The Son’s Descent to Death and Ascent to Glory Starting Point > Descent to Conquer Death > Ascent as His Father’s Heir Isaiah saw Jehovah’s descent: “He was despised and disdained by men, a man of grief, accustomed to suffering. . . Yet he bore our sufferings, endured our griefs, though we thought him stricken, smitten of God, and humbled. . . He was harassed yet submissive, and opened not his mouth—like a lamb led to slaughter. . . Who can apprize his generation that he was cut off from the land of the living for the crime of my people to whom the blow was due? . . . Jehovah willed to crush him, causing him suffering, that, if he made his life an offering for guilt, he might see his offspring and prolong his days, and that the purposes of Jehovah might prosper in his hand.” (Isaiah 53:3–4, 7–8, 10; emphasis added.)” – P. 298 The Son Obtains the Resurrection The next aspect of the Son becoming like His father is that He obtains the resurrection for Himself and Humanity through the Father In other words, the Son effectively connects Humanity with eternity. Having obtained the resurrection, He obtained the power of the resurrection in Himself like His father. “Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life, that I might take it again. No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.” – John 10:17,18 Moreover, when we look at the resurrection, we see two types – the resurrection of life (the Just) for those who overcome evil and the resurrection of damnation (the Unjust) for those who don’t. We saw previously that the Law defines good and evil.
“[Yehovah-Yeshua] serves as his people’s proxy savior, as a vassal to an emperor—the Most High God. According to the terms of emperor–vassal relationships, the father/emperor is obliged to deliver not only his loyal son/vassal but also the people of the vassal, all who give him allegiance.” – P. 290 “The Most High God, then, must not only save his Son, Jesus Christ, from death but also his Son’s people, consistent with a vassal’s proxy role.” – P. 290 “In the pattern of the Davidic Covenant, when the Savior/Son answers for the disloyalties of his people, they too become eligible for rising from the dead. The Most High God, then, will resurrect them also, beginning with God’s elect.” – P. 291 Spiritual Salvation For those who keep the Law, who obey it, these receive Everlasting Life with the Son, and for those who obey the Law and are proxy deliverers receive Eternal Life with the Father.
“Those in the Zion/Jerusalem category—the first level of blessedness—nevertheless receive resurrection and “salvation,” which involves God’s forgiveness of their sins and his delivering them from evil. Those in the son/servant category, on the other hand—the second level of blessedness—experience resurrection, “salvation,” and “exaltation.” God makes unconditional his individual covenant with them and blesses them with “everlasting inheritances,” with thrones and dominions. Lastly, seraphs/saviors, who reach the third level of blessedness, differ from sons/servants in the degree of “exaltation” (see Figure 132). Like Enoch, Elijah, and John, they may also overcome death in this life if they choose. Figure 132 Different States of Existence in the Next Life Seraphs/Saviors—Resurrection, “Salvation,” Higher “Exaltation” [with The Father] Sons/Servants—Resurrection, “Salvation,” “Exaltation” [with The Father] Zion/Jerusalem—Resurrection, “Salvation” [with the Son] Jacob/Israel—Resurrection, No “Salvation” Babylon [, Sodom/Gomorrah, Mahan] —Category Vacated after “Punishment” [become Jacob/Israel] Perdition—[Physical and] Spiritual Death in the “Pit of Dissolution” (Babylon and Sodom who suffer for their personal sins nonetheless accept Yeshua as the Redeemer over universal sin are saved. By accepting Yeshua as humanity's redeemer they become Jacob/Israel.) Thus, heaven is not one big place, in which all are thrown together who get through the “gate.” Rather, the same spiritual levels that exist in this life, or that existed before it, exist there too. Because order and organization characterize the kingdom of God, those in the highest heavens minister to ones less high. How we lived our lives on the earth will determine which level or “mansion” we inhabit in heaven. What we sow, we reap; as we do to others, so it is done to us. Jesus showed the way in all things that are necessary for us to inherit “eternal life” or “eternal lives” (Hebrew hayê ‘ôlam). Everything about Jesus’ own life exemplified what Isaiah teaches about salvation from sin and ascent to glory.” – P. 313,314 The Son Becomes a Father of Spirits The last aspect of the Son becoming like a Most High God is that the Son becomes a creator or father of spirits – male and female - that we saw in Genesis chapter one. You may want to go back to that post HERE to review. “Isaiah asserts throughout his writings that we are indeed the offspring of God [the Father]. The idea of God as “Father” and his people as “sons” permeates the Book of Isaiah. (Isaiah 1:2; 30:1, 9; 43:6; 45:11; 63:8, 16; 64:8.) Apart from whatever technical meaning Isaiah’s terms may have— such as “father” meaning emperor, and “sons,” vassals/heirs—everything Isaiah says is first of all literal. For example, by means of an a-b-a mini-structure, Isaiah teaches that his people’s “Maker” is also their “Father,” he who has literally “begotten” them as his “sons” or “children.” (Isaiah 45:9–11.) In that sense, because we already have physical bodies, the God we worship is our own Ancestor, the Father of our spirits. Isaiah asserts that we are the offspring of God.” – P. 270 Father and Son Relationships and the Fullness of the Abrahamic Covenant
One of the big topics Dr. Gileadi presents in chapter 8 is the concept of father and son relationships. We must consider that those who reach the highest human level of blessedness that we see particularly under the fullness of the Abrahamic Covenant, which was vested in Abraham and Sarah, is the concept that the firstborn son of Abraham and Sarah became apart of their covenant arrangement with God, which we see in God, The Father and His Son - His Firstborn. It was only after Abraham offered his only son, Isaac, that God made His covenant with Abraham and Sarah unconditional and everlasting, and that Abraham and Sarah qualified to receive the blessings of numerous posterity, lands of inheritance, and God's plan to save and exalt their posterity and humanity. Moreover, the fullness of the Abrahamic Covenant could continue with Isaac. However, Isaac like Abraham would have to ascend the ladder to heaven as well as Jacob - Genesis 28. We can also see this same sort of concept under the Sinai Covenant wherein the firstborn of Israel should have been dedicated to God - as the first fruits of all things are dedicated to God - and served as temple priests instead of the sons of Aaron. "Still missing from this picture is the type of proxy sacrifice in the past that prefigured the future. Animal sacrifice suited Jehovah’s saving of humanity from the effects of transgression, not only because no human type could fully portray Jehovah’s proxy sacrifice but also because animals are innocent. The closest human type of the Son’s “loyalty” to his Father and “compliance” with his will, in being willing to die voluntarily as a human sacrifice, was Isaac, who was a grown man at the time. Abraham’s obedience to God, and Isaac’s obedience to Abraham, was all God required before he “arrested” Isaac’s sacrifice, replacing him with a ram. That ram thus became a type of the Father’s sacrifice of his Son. This may help us better understand what animal sacrifice is about. The Passover Lamb, for example, substituted for Israel’s firstborn sons during the final “plague,” or covenant curse, that came on the Egyptians. The death of Egypt’s firstborn sons turned the key in getting Israel freed from bondage. The traditional “savior” function of firstborn sons in individual families meant that after their death the entire Egyptian nation was in danger of disintegrating. On the other hand, the Passover Lamb secured Israel’s release from covenant curses, including bondage to the Egyptians and the plague of death. Like King Hezekiah, the lamb assumed a proxy role in obtaining God’s deliverance from mortal danger. No human type could fully portray Jehovah’s proxy sacrifice. The function of firstborn sons in individual families of the ancient Near East followed a pattern similar to that of vassal kings in emperor–vassal relationships." - P. 294, 295
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
June 2024
Categories |